Why pay per user if your operation works in 3 shifts?
- Kypse Solutions
- 4 hours ago
- 1 min read
Why pay per user if your operation works in 3 shifts?
The same thing happens in many logistics operations:
Work is done in two or three shifts, but the WMS charges per named user.
The result?
You're paying three times for the same role, just because the person running it changes. And the worst part is that nobody questions this model.
The reality is simple:
In logistics, work is done by process, not by person.
The number of nominal users does not reflect the actual load on the system.
Therefore, paying per user is not only inefficient…
👉 It's one of the biggest hidden costs in a CD.
This is where concurrent licensing changes the game:
You only pay for users who are active at the same time.
It doesn't matter how many shifts you have
It doesn't matter how many people rotate in.
It doesn't matter if you hire 20 temporary operators tomorrow.
Your cost remains stable.
For multi-flow, multi-schedule, or constant rotation operations, this model is not an "extra"...
It's a smart way to protect your margins and scale without fear of software costs.
At Kypse Solutions we implement KiSoft@Cloud, KNAPP 's cloud-based WMS , with concurrent licenses specifically designed for logistics operations that need flexibility without straining their budget.
If your operation works in shifts, this model allows for flexibility, while improving efficiency and control.
Has this ever happened to you?
